Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gary Sheffer's avatar

Margaret, I too was a student journalist and it led to my first full-time job at a small newspaper. So kudos to you for supporting students and hope for the future of journalism.

I am an admirer but your posts are too infrequent for a "crisis." Also, they should provide your perspective on what is happening in journalism as the crisis unfolds (as you can see, I am happy to offer my opinions but I'm here because I want to read yours).

So here's my opinion: Traditional media is not capable of covering this presidential election effectively. Example? The NYT calls a 9/11 denier racist lunatic that is in Trump's inner circle a "far-right activist." Wouldn't a more specific truth be better? There are many more examples of journalistic contortions in the name of balance, fairness, or whatever. With each, journalism becomes a little less relevant and essential to society.

Expand full comment
Carol Gamm's avatar

It’s difficult to be optimistic about the media while the MSM continuously normalizes Trump and Vance. These people are fascists yet are reported as if they are part of a traditional political process. We may pay dearly for the media’s “both sides journalism.” Why are Vance’s cat comments news? What about Trump’s support for American Nazis? What’s going on with Trump and the Russians? Not worthy of reporting? Edward R Murrow has indeed left the building. Good for the kids. They are our only hope.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts