Hello, again, Margaret—I could not agree with you more about the abysmal coverage of the presidential campaign (or about “Anatomy of a Fall”) but it’s going to require someone far more creative than I to figure out what can be successfully done about it. As I’ve noted previously and as I believe you agree, the Gray Lady Paper of Record a…
Hello, again, Margaret—I could not agree with you more about the abysmal coverage of the presidential campaign (or about “Anatomy of a Fall”) but it’s going to require someone far more creative than I to figure out what can be successfully done about it. As I’ve noted previously and as I believe you agree, the Gray Lady Paper of Record appears clearly biased, as it did in 2016 (“but her emails!”), in Trump’s favor, whether intentionally or through misunderstanding what journalism is supposed to be about.
And if the NYT remains so deficient, there may well be no one with a wide enough audience to effectuate a remedy.
I am hopeful that your April 1 program can spark some creative ideas about solutions.
Hello, again, Margaret—I could not agree with you more about the abysmal coverage of the presidential campaign (or about “Anatomy of a Fall”) but it’s going to require someone far more creative than I to figure out what can be successfully done about it. As I’ve noted previously and as I believe you agree, the Gray Lady Paper of Record appears clearly biased, as it did in 2016 (“but her emails!”), in Trump’s favor, whether intentionally or through misunderstanding what journalism is supposed to be about.
And if the NYT remains so deficient, there may well be no one with a wide enough audience to effectuate a remedy.
I am hopeful that your April 1 program can spark some creative ideas about solutions.